Thursday 31 March 2011

The fastest House in the World - John Parr

Description: Habitat for Humanity presents the world record for building a house in less than 4 hours. John Parr, the TOC Consultant, uses Critical Chain Project Management to bring the team to smash the previous world record by a massive 55 minutes.


Use the Link below to see the film:

The Fastest House in The World

Since this record was set there may have been a new record ... but I don't know about any.

Accelerate BP's Gulf of Mexico Cleanup

Theory of Constraints Tapped to Accelerate BP's Gulf of Mexico Cleanup

The process helped BP save more than $200 million by identifying key measurements and planning the bottleneck into the operation.

By Adam Brown, Pinnacle Strategies

March 18, 2011
Rarely does a business management theorist get a chance to prove himself by taking a key role in the fast-breaking news story of the year. And even rarer does it lead to concrete success.

That was the opportunity presented to Pinnacle Strategies CEO Mark Woeppel when BP surprised him with a call for help fighting the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The call would lead Pinnacle on an international mission to boost output of spill fighting equipment and then to help organize a historic mop up -- the cleaning of more than 10,000 boats, ships and rig...

Creating a Public Works Revolution in Japan

The Earthquake and Tsunami in Japan will really test the new way they run their infrastructure (public works) projects. The changes implemented in the last 10 years or so should help them recover more quickly than they would have traditionally.

The story is also about saving lives -

The link below is to a video (42 minutes) talking about the successes achieved and how it came about. I am told that ALL infrastructure projects are now managed by CCPM. A key in Japan is that with Critical Chain they were able to create "WA" or Harmony between the public, (residents), the government and the contractors. Projects are finished sooner, lives are saved, cooperation is much greater, trust has grown, and contractors make more money money while saving money for the taxpayer.

http://www.toc.tv/?id=97&lang=de

You can watch the video for free until April10.

There will be more infrastructure project presentations in June 2011 at the TOCICO conference in New York.

Sunday 27 March 2011

The 5 Steps to Focus - Step 1: The Limiting Factor

In business, what is focus? The objective or goal of most businesses is to make money – as much as possible now and even more in the future. Every manager and every employee is (or should be) focused in a way that achieves that. My question is: Are all managers correctly focused to make as much money as possible now and in the future?

If I where to ask almost any manager in any business I believe the answer I would get is an incredulous look for such a silly question. Of course that is their focus.

Nevertheless I am quite sure that the majority of managers, while focused, have the wrong focus (sometimes what is called focus is something like focus on everything). Their company’s bottom line is damaged.

(I owe the 5 Focusing Steps to Dr. Eliyahu M. Goldratt)

 

The Limiting Factor

Every good manager continually asks, ‘How can I achieve a better performance? How can I get ahead?’ Senior managers often hear requests for more people, better people, training for their people, investment in more equipment, investment in new and more modern machines. These requests are all a sign that the manager making the request has identified something he believes will help him get ahead in his career. To get ahead his department within the business must have the best performance – he needs to be the star in the eyes of the boss.

If al managers, all employees, are doing their best to optimize their department, division or area; won’t the business be optimal? Or, could it be, that everyone doing the best for himself causes damage and sub-optimization in other parts f the business. It seems to me that everyone optimizing his area has a petty good chance f causing the business as a whole to be sib-optimal.

Should the CEO or managing director care whether or not the various areas of his business are operating optimally? Shouldn’t he be concerned with the results of the business as a whole? If the businesses results are optimal, while one or the other part of his business is not – what does he care? I speculate that your business is more likely to be optimal if the CEO focuses on the right thing – to get the most from whatever part of the business is the weakest link. The weakest link determines the maximum amount of money your business can make. (Even if your goal is something other than profit, making money is always a necessary condition to achieve your real target.)

This means that a requirement for every CEO is to know what his weakest link is. The first step f business focus is to ‘Identify the Constraint’.

In some businesses it is quite easy to identify where the constraint is. It (the machine, person or group) will have the biggest pile of work in front of them waiting to get done. If you are in this situation you are in an excellent position – you know where to focus!

Unfortunately there is a bad practice at work in many of the businesses around the World. It can be summarized byA resource standing idle is a major waste.’ It seems to make sense, but look at the damage if every resource (people and machines) does work at capacity. Inventory will pile up at the constraint for sure, but it will pile up all over the factory and all over the business. There will be so much work in process that a constraint can no longer be easily identified, lead-times to get anything done will be enormous (Little’s Law), money will be tied up in too much inventory in process and managers will clamour for more resources just to get the backlog down. Fortunately a lack of space or insufficient funds (and a good finance department) will prevent the worst excesses.  Nevertheless the need to keep resources busy (by managers and all employees) is so strong that work in process will usually be much higher than necessary.

To find the limiting factor a business must first drain work in process from the system until only the weakest link still has working waiting in a queue.

‘A resource standing idle is a major waste’ is a policy. It may not be a written policy, but that does not matter – if it is enforced as a work rule, it is a policy and will have the effects described. There are in fact many policies that can harm business results. Local optimisation instead of global optimisation is another. Standard costs, product costs, management by objectives are all policies when incorrectly implemented will harm your business. There are many policies and policies represent huge opportunities for business improvement. Many are damaging.

Policies are difficult things. They are implemented for very good reasons. When they are implemented businesses forget to check for potential negative consequences. When you deal wit these damaging policies it will be important to not remove the beneficial parts of them while ensuring that the negative consequences are cured.

We have our first step on the road to real focus: 1. Identify the Constraint.

Cooperation two mules

 


Where or what might the limiting factor be?

 

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday 23 March 2011

5 Focusing Steps

The link below takes you to a short video by TOCCA (TOC Consultants in Australia) that is kinda cute and that demonstrates the 5 steps very well. Don't scoff at the simplicity of the example - the 5 steps hold true in any system!

5 Focusing Steps

Hope you like it!!


Cartoon by Gerhard Veitsberger


Friday 18 March 2011

Swiss Business Under Threat

In January I wrote a series of short articles about Swiss business being under threat because of the strength of the Swiss Franc. The $ is now at about 0.90 Swiss Francs which makes Swiss exports to there even more expensive. Luckily the € is strengthening just a fraction so that at least Swiss competitiveness in the Eurozone has not deteriorated any more.

Swiss Business Under Threat -I

Swiss Business Under Threat -II

Swiss Business Under Threat -III

Swiss Business Under Threat -IV

Swiss Business Under Threat -V

TOCICO WEEKLY NEWS

TOCICO WEEKLY NEWS


Dr. Eli Goldratt - Keynote Speaker
Don't miss the TOCICO International Conference this year and the only opportunity this year to participate in member upgrade workshops with Dr. Eli Goldratt.
Dr. Eli Goldratt is once again generously donating his time to the TOCICO for a two day upgrade for members. Dr. Goldratt will also close the conference with his provocative thoughts on the future. Dr. Goldratt has been traveling the world in his Now and into the Future tour and the TOCICO is so fortunate to host Dr. Goldratt at the 2011 International conference.
Dr. Eli Goldratt is an educator, author, scientist, philosopher, and business leader. But he is, first and foremost, a thinker who provokes others to think. Often characterized as unconventional, stimulating, and "a slayer of sacred cows,” Dr. Goldratt exhorts his audience to examine and reassess their business practices with a fresh, new vision. He obtained his Bachelor of Science degree from Tel Aviv University and his Masters of Science, and Doctorate of Philosophy from Bar-Ilan University. In addition to his pioneering work in Business Management and education, he holds patents in a number of areas ranging from medical devices to drip irrigation to temperature sensors.

Speakers and Topics you can find here:

Saturday 12 March 2011

Thursday 10 March 2011

"A major mistake that managers make" - Russell Ackhoff (Re-Published because of the “Which MBA? Think Twice!” article)

"All through school we are taught that making a mistake is a bad thing. We are downgraded for them. When we graduate and enter the real world and the organizations that occupy it, the aversion to mistakes continues. As a result one tries either to avoid them or, if one is made, to conceal it or transfer blame to another. We pay a high price for this because one can only learn from mistakes; by identifying and correcting them.
… in business, if mistakes are made and laws are not broken, you rarely see any formal investigation. Even when the companies themselves look into what happened, they don’t do it in a structured and rigorous way. They don’t learn anything from the process. (Mittelstaedt, Jr., 2005)

One does not learn from doing something right; one already knows how to do it. By doing something right one gets confirmation of what one already knows but no new knowledge. The fact that schools are more interested in teaching than in learning is apparent from their failure to determine if students learn from their mistakes. Once they are graded based on the number of mistakes they make, the teacher presses on, does not check to determine whether the student has learned from the mistakes made.

Schools, including business schools, do not even reveal the fact that there are two kinds of mistakes."

Read more of Russell Ackhoff's article here: <http://www.acasa.upenn.edu/A_MAJOR_MISTAKE.pdf>
PICT0055
Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Tuesday 1 March 2011

Funny Story about Activity Based Costing II

Gary Case commented that my post was first published in 1969 - which may be before Activity Based Costing's start! Here is what he said!.
This story was printed 41 years ago by the General Accounting Office, Fall, 1969; author unknown at that time also. It is unfortunate that after all of these years, our accounting practices have not changed very much.

Great story, I still love it every time I read it.
Posted by Gary CaseThe Thinker Surrounded by Gears Photographic Print C11862345
Technorati Tags: , , , ,